Seen use by creative abuse

If any abuse is there think to stop it then the creator stops what you don't think is necessary or don't need to work better. I think or not fits the point, so you see the point you so if you think, then your focus can know what is there by area you think. I figured out you aren't a target if you are one or thinking your one. So lets hope that works as you wish.

If you think you're a target, stop then think to do something else as long as it's normal. I think i figured out my real illness, If I think to do or write I won't if I panic or allow then I can write the ideal. So I will write as I think or will and I don't have to be there to write it.
This is where I think as you want to do things, or work until I don't need to do things as this is use of this. I think this is a blog based off my past life, working with memories that I happen to remember.

Solar sight use.

You can use anything from within this blog. Think to use this ideal with the solar widget. The concept use this ideal. This you sense k/a-a or 304a/k is with this subtracted from f or flux = k/s for kilowatt per seconds or amount of ability to work with by use, the measured amount by time the event is there in millisecond converted is seconds or 304a/k is seconds to milliseconds with 70 c or below safe. What's safe is usage to feel from a distance. What you think you feel you know as you realize is x-a/f = amps in perceived use as ohm. i think the area you consider is what you are aware, this is sensation by x-f/304a by feel that is ohm by the feel.

So for the machines amp per sec measure the current, this means all you need is created area effect. This is set by observing the feel or feeling with what is by volcanic area feel, or ground tremblings that you think is related to the sun interactivity. The relation isn't associated by number. So this kelvin creates by feel what you think sometimes converted from celcius or farehnheit. Here is the conversion sight
http://www.unit-conversion.info/temperature.html to use as though a calculator. Whats useful is think to convert the speed of light to mps or miles per second using https://www.unitjuggler.com/convert-speed-from-c-to-ms.html to create the ideal better for ixa / c or calcification amount due to effect.

This is kelvin or the solar k = 6 or less for safe use or under 10 or over is non hazardous is sometimes radiative. The k value is
html area chart so this is there for research C/f +/- a = to see a solar flare seeable by effect or you feel. C is the speed of light you sense or 3.00x10 to the power of 8 otherwise ^8, f is the flux that applies as ptn flux with + electric flux with - from amps.

So that is the average or high class system for the sunlight, so that is k/s or kilowatt seconds per amperage you have seen by feel or see for sense is sensation. There is some feel. See that you think will impede or allow safe machine use so if you are able to use the machine then your with luck or no need to worry if the machine isn't overheating or used.

See if normal warmth things are possibly safe or sane by reacting till area, use is thinking "no reaction" or "allow" is thought. So if unbearably warm where the area is cool know this is some event or "its all is use by feel or none is the use". Think about the ideal, think about the feel then, your knowing what you're doing with things. Any one line or word will do.

So otherwise so I believe or I think so, you see this by feel is not that till necessary. I believe x-x/f - k/f subtracted works for the feel equals the k/o or kelvin per ohm sight feel, otherwise k/f works as a percent you create to possible failure. Ohm is feel with area by sensation, X is x-ray.

Due notice of certain events, this idea is sometimes not fully proven. As there could be no k index or 1 k index and the ideal situation is proven to exist problems, sometimes in equipment but it is as though a proven point when it works. That is all there is to this idea so enjoy.

The f is flux or area time you think some temperature is unusual in milliseconds or seconds k by feel is kelvin or the k with the widget or chart the higher the temp the more the feel is there. So this is not physical hits the energy feel makes you think is there. This is energy use by the feel, this uses sensation to create with or thought is area feel. Think cool or work by activity.

So drop down this to see the solar widget with the rest by the information. See by ideal or not, "to convert the Kelvin to E%, use K/4, take the decimal as the percent. Take the first 3 numbers, of the decimal. Round up on the third digit. For chaos area by your or other influence with decay energy percent divide kelvin/3 = rb %.

Past life research says that by 30% this is destructive area feel released by the feeling, so work with it or think to not react. This is so you feel your chance may seem to work. If not then your doing what you can, till what you want to do is not needed or not important. This details percent chance for energy to work or not work." So drop down the temperature below 70 c. Then this works. This works by what you do or create with feel, so I think this is with things or all there is to this.


Seeing as this came from a past life idea and the present life idea is to use what comes to me. This includes the past. So it is what things are, I believe that this will work to the advantage if used.
So I think if its used, then you can work with machines more easily. Yet think, if used right this could be an early warning system. See that means it works with your system, and this means that your right on target with what you need to do.

Volcano sighting solar sights



Tuesday, December 25, 2012

Buraks metaphysical rant

   For those that claim that metaphysical energies don't exist because they have failed to prove their existence trough experimentation; the simple fact that an experiment being subject to the modern tools and receptive apparatus' is enough reason to conclude that these energies simply can't be perceived using our technology or that the traditional science doesn't include an experiment that would bring out the conclusive evidence.

  A primitive experiment the said skeptic puts into action is a simple object being put on the table in front of a said practitioner of telekinesis\energy working and ask him to move the object using these energies at his disposal. The practitioner focuses on the object and the object doesn't move, proving the skeptic right.

  Now the proof here is only self declared because of the fact that by comparison we can all experiment that there is almost no physical energy that can move, lets say, a wooden object either. Take electricity for example. How much would it move if you connected 2 cables of several volts into a wooden object? None. Even if you decorated the wooden object with serious measurement tools of electricity, there would still be almost no output since the wooden object is not conductive.

  So how smart is it to directly apply direct telekinetic notions from a single doubting mind towards an object that is not know with its ability to receive or react to these energies, let alone being able to determine this reaction by having the right tools to do so? Is this the right way of measuring metaphysical energy, since its not even the right way to measure a very definitive energy like electricity?

  Many things are not conductive, making it impossible to witness direct current by using only these objects. Many objects are conductive which made it possible for us to discover the energy of electricity. Some objects are semi conductive which causes electricity to show a different effect on different matters that are observably effected by it.

  The effectiveness of an energy on a single type of object using a single type of method or energy can't be a definitive experiment. Some objects could be totally immune to it. Hell the fact that almost every object being immune to react or show these energies in a direct manner might be the core reason for being unable to perceive these energies on the daily life to begin with, like many organic objects being semi-conductors having resulted in the discovery of direct current to take several thousand years.

  Does heat have the same effect on every object that it comes,in contact with? Different kinds of objects have different conduction or radiation of heat levels, some not doing it at all if the heat is not enough. Cold is the absence of heat and it can't be measured without having a certain amount of heat in the measurement tools or the environment. Should we declare cold an energy too, since its observable?

  Or should we discard static energy because we cant measure it without implementing kinetic force on it? What if we didn't know about kinetic energy, would that mean static energy didn't exist as well?

  What if for example we haven't yet discovered the technology to forge the materials that happen to be conductive? We would have never discovered electricity. What happens when you implement a high degree of heat in a very short time to a cube of ice? Nothing. Can that be used to prove or disprove the existence of heat energy?

  So just the fact that we are trying to directly use the metaphysical energies on matters doesn't mean that these energies don't exist. And the amount of the observable output (telekinetic energy has been measured by using very delicate tools but the amount is so small that it is counted as insignificant) being too small doesn't mean that it doesn't have any effect. After all if you can lit a candle and apply it on a piece of rock it wont do anything, whereas it would burn a wooden object.

  But I wont deny the fact that large amounts of any energy mostly have an effect on almost everything. For example you cant move a wooden object with a bit of electricity but you can turn it into crisp or even blow it up with a larger amount. I only say that we having less ability to transmit huge amounts of telekinetic energy doesn't mean that it wouldn't have *any* effect. Or doesn't mean that these things don't exist to begin with.

  Also we can make an electronic motor and attach wheels on a wooden object and *move* the wooden object using the electric energy. But directly applying it can't be compared to this. This also shows that we simply don't know the right method to apply, the same example, kinetic energy on an object to make it move.

  So its all a matter of finding the right method to apply it and the right tools to put it into effect. Actually energy workers already claim that they have the right tools to observe these energies, just not all of them are able to be converted into telekinetic energy.

  So yeah, experimentation goes as far as the technology to do so. Before that point only exists philosophy and that's what we use anyway. Don't let skeptics and realists confuse you! Reality only goes as far as invention! If you told a man from 500 years ago that his body is made up of countless tiny animals that are producing acid, he would laugh at your face too.

No comments:

Post a Comment