Theres a difference in seeing in todays time in how its a perception. As you can feel things more than see them and its interesting what you can see. Feeling things helps with the healing of someone, as you usually don't see whats beneath the flesh. Unless you have x-ray vision. The third eye things are on another layer of the normal vision. Where you could visualize astral things in the normal world just as they are happening. But for some reason that you can't do that, where there is possibly too much energy to be actually perceiving the idea by seeing it, you just have to feel things out and fill in the gaps, allowing your subconscious to help the process. For example if you let out a burst of energy in front of yourself, what you would "see" would more likely be an inference based on the feeling, unless it was a visible energy.
If you "feel", then it is very likely that that is your natural form of sensing, as such you should embrace it and develop it further instead of trying to learn any other form.
Also, thats another reason to learn that and only that. This "feel" that I'm talking about is in fact the natural form of sensing. It is the actual sense, the sense. I have done research about this. I have looked into the minds of people who use different sensing "techniques", people who see or hear or use information of any format other than this "feel", and of course also people who use exactly this. And I have analyzed what ACTUALLY happens, down on the hardware level, so to speak, when one senses. The results were very clear and precise.
I discovered exactly how our subtle sense works. All of these people use one and the same sense, they do the exact same thing, the only difference is data processing.
Here's how it works. When you want to sense something, you focus on your target and then you do whatever your sensing technique tells you to do, just do it, will yourself to perceive the target or maybe "reach out with tendrils of tendrily goodness" or any other number of silly psipog techniques. What actually happens however is the following: Your sub-c acquires a target because you're focusing on it, and from whatever techniques or visualization you're doing, it takes the hint that you want to perceive this target that you're focusing on and then it focuses the sense(the sense/the energy sense/the subtle sense/the sixth sense/the astral sense/the inner eye/the third eye/the inner sight/vision and et el) on this target. The sense then, within a split-second picks up, and pardon me this slip into mundane measurements, terabytes of data about the target. Yes, even if the target is a mote of dust, there are still terabytes of data about it.
I could now write out a huge, and totally pointless, list of some of the things that are picked up at this point, but seeing as it's pointless, I'll refrain from doing that. If anyone is curious they can look into their own mind when they sense.
Either way, most of this data, 99.999999% in fact, you really don't care about at the moment, so it doesn't need to be processed. More to the point, processing ALL OF IT, would take some time, even for such a superior processing body as the mind is. So the sub-c once again picks up the hint from your conscious thoughts on what you want to know. For an example: you are focusing on what the target looks like, or what it does, or how it does it, how it works in general, what kind of energy is it made of, what kind of energy does it use, and so on and so forth. Now by default, this data is processed into the form that is the most natural for the mind, because to get it from raw data to this form requires the least amount of processing, and in fact it requires barely any processing, where one could rightly say that to present it this way doesn't require any processing at all and is thus the most efficient. This form is the "feel" that I'm talking about.
Now, this form is not only the most processing efficient, it is also the most usage efficient. This is because this form, in itself, contains all of the 5 physical sense-data forms PLUS some other forms of data that are never present on physical. You have an all in one sense that is better at sight than sight itself, better than hearing than physical hearing organs, and so on and so on. In other words, this is the original sense, the sense, and when you allow it to present it's data in the form that is natural to it, the "feel" as you so aptly called it, it far surpasses any other sense, form of sensing or other form of presenting it's data.
When someone, on the other hand, decides to be stubborn, and forces their mind to convert this pure, cool, slick, lean and mean, data into some inferior form like, just sight, the mind obliges. This takes some effort on the part of the sub-c, this take some time, and of course once presented, you have one tiny piece of the jigsaw, which can often be misinterpreted or misunderstood or any of the myriad of other problems could happen.
A warning before someone decides to be nit-picky, the processing time difference is tiny, split-split-second, because the mind is such an amazing processing body, however the split-split-second that sounds inconsequential when you are sensing a serene flower garden, can be the difference between success and failure in an action situation.
Once processed the data is presented to the conscious mind and we then consider it or do whatever we want to do with it.
To me, this real sensing is 'knowing'. A deeper knowledge than that the sky is blue and that rain is made from water. It's just 'truth', without human beliefs messing with it. The navigator's knowledge. Yes, that knowing, that pure, raw knowledge of the universe, that's exactly what I mean by the 'feel' of sensing. It is the natural form of data as a natural language of the mind. Of which it can be achieved, while doing things and not thinking about it. Sometimes with the intent of 'knowing' it. Sometimes, this can lead to stupidity but often its not when combined with a psychic gift or intuition.
No comments:
Post a Comment